Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/no-channel
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brent Fitzgerald
@bf
I’m sorry but who is actually minting blog or newsletter posts and why?
7 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
I guess it's kind of like a decentralized version of giving someone 5 USDC for a banger? (Needs some rebranding tho)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
MetaEnd🎩
@metaend.eth
mine come as a beautiful NFT all the time :) https://paragraph.xyz/@metaend/flux-prompt-engineering-guide
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nuel. 🎩
@nuelprime
don’t go there 😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TheModestThief🎩
@thief
I think of it as a super-like. Most of the time cost is quite low anyway.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
My go to answer, which is featured in my blog post “The Next Chapter: Onchain Patronage” is that NFTs conceptually are only one thing, a receipt of payment. We never own the words or the image we pay for, we own the proof we’ve paid. This makes all form of Onchain collection little more than a form of patronage. Fortunately that is also the best reason to mint creative work: to support the artist. Check it out and feel free to collect it if you like it 💚 https://thumbsup.mirror.xyz/u3Ue1hNOb6ifdhzMWChzGyrS5h6u1yzyGwMVw0RHRmw
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bradq
@bradq
I’m not but by observation I see two categories doing it: 1. people who want to support the creator 2. people who are excited about an “onchain life” who mint everything as a record of activity.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rafa
@rafa
I mint them all the time, why? 1. puts the link in my wallet, 2. if done right, means I don’t have linkrot on the article (the NFT / token has the text either embedded or via IPFS or Arweave); and 3. Most importantly it’s like a super-duper like. I sent money to the author directly as evidence of my support / patronage
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
