Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π sonya (in theory) π°
@sonyasupposedly
important reminder: "onchain" truthfully refers to the *transaction* and the metadata; otherwise it's mostly a marketing term https://app.t2.world/article/cm3cubfxx1313971ymc6nfncsnb from /lanparty @benoit-tokyo @benna the art itself may not, in fact, be on ~the blockchain~! make sure to maintain your own backup archive of your work, and any other pieces that you care about keeping for the long haul
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
π benna ππ©
@benna
thank you so much for sharing the article, and for this reminder, Sonya! i learned SO much writing this article with @benoit-tokyo, and i really hope that artists and collectors who aren't aware of this will too.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
π sonya (in theory) π°
@sonyasupposedly
I love that @ripe puts a lot of art onchain-onchain, like the art itself is onchain. really cool to see how those constraints shape the work while also opening up different possibilities
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
π benna ππ©
@benna
would love to hear more about how you do it @ripe !! I was struck when Regina told us that she hasn't seen a single artwork that is 'truly fully onchain'. Might be a question of definition/semantics, but it made me want to look into various examples of what could be considered 'fully onchain art' more.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ripeβ
@ripe
there's tons of great onchain art out there. so much that it can take a while to appreciate it all. re: defining onchain, i've always like this breakdown of different levels on onchain-ness https://www.0xchain.art/info
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
