Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
1) obviously 1b) they can 2) this is going to infuriate trump https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/19/mark-cuban-supporting-kamala-harris-interview
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

max β†‘πŸŽ© pfp
max β†‘πŸŽ©
@baseddesigner.eth
It's like no one is manipulating H lmao, the fact she's in that position right now is purely due to manipulations over many years no?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Yes the system is deeply deeply broken. I think the only point of Mark’s response and my comments about it are it shows that these folks think Trump is stupid and easy to use for their needs, and they are, I believe, correct.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
And given that their needs will by nature be at odds with the needs of the citizenry and the norms of democracy, I think that will be somewhat if not extremely unprecedented in the form it takes.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

max β†‘πŸŽ© pfp
max β†‘πŸŽ©
@baseddesigner.eth
What do you think about marks drug cost company?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
I think within the context of the bizarre American pharmaceutical industry, it has been a net good. But I think it’s a workaround for a much bigger problem. I think capitalists, free-market absolutists, and American-exceptionalists should see it as innovative and masterful.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

max β†‘πŸŽ© pfp
max β†‘πŸŽ©
@baseddesigner.eth
This one is also born within the system right, to not be a workaround there would need to be a change of people in charge and defending those policies + change and perhaps removal of unnecessary regulations
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
There would need to be a switch to a single-payer system. The only person I think has pushed for this is Bernie.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction