myk.eth pfp
myk.eth
@myk
this is the kind of response that makes me say: "devs thought of everything" I actually didn't realize it settles based on the series. Bracky had a hunch that I didn't really understand what I was betting on and clarified it for me before placing my bet. we got sentient AGI before gta 6 @maxp.eth @tldr
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

max ↑ pfp
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
yes it’s not clear at first what are the conditions for golf last month it was betting on the winner of the whole thing for example
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

max ↑ pfp
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
but I’m sure they’ll have a clear UI later showing you what’s up and what you have right now and I think that UI would beat in feed betting for the most part
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

myk.eth pfp
myk.eth
@myk
> I think that UI would beat in feed betting for the most part wanna bet? 😜
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Agree with all your points. How were thinking is: if we lean on UI too heavily atm, we will miss out on solving the really tough challenge here: How to lean on the agent for complete onboarding and understanding? That’s the net new, big opportunity. (I believe OG Bracket already solved trading UI/UX in a preliminary way - so can reactivate when we have capacity… and have an agent that can fully service the “first experience” as it’s discovered in feed)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions