sunny_jamz
@balface
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
5 replies
4 recasts
46 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
2 recasts
6 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions
4 replies
45 recasts
69 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
8 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
The reason why "DAOs" require traditional governance is because blockchains can only do strict global consensus
The assumption is you need a token to organise said governance, but this is not true. Indeed, some DAOs would be much better off following the worker cooperative or consumer cooperative model, rather than the public company model, with democratic voting and vetos for checks and balances (instead of being controlled by few whales, as it is for almost all crypto projects now - not just not decentralized, but very centralized. VCAOs, if you will, pun intended)
Yeah, I get it, token gambling is crypto's big usecase, but it doesn't have to be. Building the best possible protocol to attract the most users might not be such a bad idea for the long term 11 replies
42 recasts
144 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
14 replies
13 recasts
100 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
