Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
Move from the two-party system to the N-city system.
20 replies
22 recasts
189 reactions
Abbas🎩👾 pfp
Abbas🎩👾
@abbass.eth
Explanation ; moving away from a binary political framework to a more decentralized or multipolar approach, where multiple parties, regions, or entities have significant influence, rather than just two dominant ones. This could lead to more diversity in political representation and potentially more localized governance. >>Ping me to delete this if i'm wrong.<<
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Return the States to power. Either disband the union entirely or move to a parliament system. The latter will never happen, the former might.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Love this. I suggested an N-city framework for thinking about Farcaster's path forward, and I still believe it strongly. Also, while the *specifics* of the Aristotelian insight about an ideal city size (~10K people) have been altered by invention of digital communication, the *general concept* that there are ideal and non-ideal sizes for different types of human association is an insight that we need to think about more deeply from first principles as we build out the future of politics. https://warpcast.com/tldr/0x93f7095c https://warpcast.com/tldr/0x16265951
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Bring Greece back?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sujit 🇮🇳 🎩 pfp
Sujit 🇮🇳 🎩
@0xsujit
That is the only way to break from this insanity.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kevin mfer 🎩 pfp
kevin mfer 🎩
@kevinmfer
big balaji
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Funut pfp
Funut
@funut.eth
N-Country system next
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
On a serious note, decentralization likely makes people happier because they can choose their politics. But as we well know the US with its current global power position (even if you believe it is descending) has to maintain unity to project strength. Decentralization typically means weaker military.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chinmay 🕹️🍿 pfp
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
Would that be just too fragmented and create an information overload for the voters?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
The Electric Word pfp
The Electric Word
@electric-word
What voting system do you expect Network states to implement that would guarantee that they have more than two parties? What prevents Network states from implementing a two-party system if they choose? What prevents Network states being a one-party state?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Panji 🟡 ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Panji 🟡 ⌐◨-◨
@pramadan.eth
N-city is where the citizen get free N-word pass?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DzeeRoggs pfp
DzeeRoggs
@dzeeroggs
How about start with multiple parties first. Works in other places on earth, too..
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TS pfp
TS
@tsuipen
What does that mean? Different political party per city? Why don’t the Americans have regional parties like in other democracies? Also, if the Democratic Party is such a big problem, wouldn’t it be better to encourage regional parties as an alternative rather than ‘the internet’?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dvyne pfp
Dvyne
@dummie.eth
Creating a network?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Duraa pfp
Duraa
@duraa.eth
What does it mean!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Refan pfp
Refan
@refan
it can also lead to more fragmented politics and potentially unstable coalitions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kreept.degen.eth pfp
Kreept.degen.eth
@kreept
I don’t want to sound like a potato rn but, what’s the ‘N-city’ system? 🫠
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
22 pfp
22
@themuyideen.eth
How about a multiparty system with atleast 6 of them
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
sounds painful tho
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction