balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
Farcaster is a single-tribe network, not a social network. Big difference.
15 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
A single-tribe network is a better name for what I was calling* a 1-network. It's a social network where there is only one tribe. There isn't yelling or squabbling to the same extent because people have been pre-filtered on values. * See: https://thenetworkstate.com/on-network-states#0-network-1-network-n-networks
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Dylan Field pfp
Dylan Field
@zoink
I do wonder how quickly networks need to become multi-tribe to stay relevant for the long term
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

jacob pfp
jacob
@jacob
Tribal network.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
I agree but also feel like @v and @dwr.eth are doing this deliberately to learn how to scale quality communities with the end goal of being multi network. Aka this is a strategy not an end goal. Time will tell, and it’s exciting to see it happen in real time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben  - [C/x] pfp
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
A web of interoperable single-tribe networks is the future. It's really how civil society has evolved, more so than purely unguarded ‘social networks’.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
At this moment in time definitely Forever though? 🤷‍♀️ I no longer even pretend to predict the future with any certainty - I leaned that from someone I admire (🫵 🤣)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pranav Yerabati 🎩 pfp
Pranav Yerabati 🎩
@yeradaoti.eth
Does that mean each single-tribe network I am a part of, could be one of the various “puzzle pieces” that make me me and not someone else, if my digital identity were in fact interoperable across all?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
prob more accurate to say that the current users of this particular FC client seem to be very like minded or single tribe, but could change as more people join FC also only shows you posts from people you follow, so more tribes could exist that u don’t 👀 FC as a protocol tho has no opinions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rob pfp
rob
@robertfelt.eth
do you anticipate Farcaster evolving into a multi-tribe network?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Stefan  pfp
Stefan
@basedstefan.eth
Hey! I've recently purchased your cast! You can now claim your 🎩 DEGEN tokens on jam! 🟣 https://jam.so/ 🟣
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Elie pfp
Elie
@elie
Is that because it's still so small?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Petri pfp
Petri
@petri
Single vs. multi requirement comes down to the business model in the end. Can you make enough revenues to sustain your social network? This David Foster Wallace point is still valid and Twitter seems to have struggled with it always: https://twitter.com/ntmoney/status/1605279421090484234?s=61&t=u0i5T63zwdCyUC0WsfqW_Q
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

barton ⊛ pfp
barton ⊛
@bmorphism
Yes! Zulip has incredibly focused single-tribe networks as well, but their max size is capped at total # of experts. Farcaster tribe succeeds at a more balanced member graph, not just one focused on expertise-gated outer reaches of human experience 📐 https://categorytheory.zulipchat.com https://i.imgur.com/osII8uh.p
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

🔮 pfp
🔮
@loracle.eth
That's very true. However, we can grow and try to keep that in mind, by creating cyber-tribes, or sub-tribes on Farcaster, segregated by their Web3 signature (NFT holding, etc..)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MC10 | Bankless Consulting 🎯 pfp
MC10 | Bankless Consulting 🎯
@mc10
What's more valuable for the users, a single-tribe network or a social network?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction