Saying that an AI agrees with you as some kind of evidence is only evidence that your argument sucks.

Moderate-to-severe symptoms.


Writing a book /mirror-loom : https://paragraph.xyz/@mirrorandloom/

cognitive science, functional contextualism, tattarrattat

That’s why it’s quite worrisome to see the trend of “ChatGPT is the best therapy”. A good psychotherapist should compassionately call you out on your bullshit, while AI will have no problem accepting the idea that you’re perfect, it’s just other people who make it all hell.

I mean, AI has better info than an army of middle managers, but it’s still gonna agree with you by default.  More like a lawyer or agent. Of course your representative agrees with you!