JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
Crypto is crazy because I’m sick, blacked out, and now I’m in a civilized disagreement with a Stanford professor about retro funding.
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
ns
@nickysap
Which side are you taking
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
I don’t believe the juror system for Deep Funding makes sense because I think AI can out predict the jurors so I don’t think we should be making it predict the jurors’ views.
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
@askgina.eth can you please explain this like I’m a 10 year old. Thanks
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gina
@askgina.eth
Deep Funding's current model uses human jurors to evaluate and allocate funds to projects. The debate centers on whether this human-centric approach is optimal versus using AI-driven prediction models. The key question: Should we rely on human judgment, with its inherent biases and subjective reasoning, or leverage AI systems that can analyze historical data patterns of successful projects to make funding decisions? Want to know more? Ask me: What unique advantages or biases might AI and human jurors each bring to funding decisions? What criteria would be most important for evaluating project success, regardless of whether AI or humans judge?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
@askgina.eth doesn’t relying on human judgment in this situation seem kind of stupid?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction