Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
I have ideas on next steps after the Network State conference. But I’m interested in yours. What’s next?
36 replies
19 recasts
58 reactions

Arhat pfp
Arhat
@arhat
We need a forum discussing problems, not ideas, and a few dedicated builders, investors & contributors implementing an idea. This way, it stays selective, but engagement is bottom-up. This way, you demonstrate new governance models at the local level. Show working examples of what a network state could look like.
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

Kien 🙏 pfp
Kien 🙏
@kienfam
plenty of web3 built tools to make it happen:) or do you want to build one? I'm ideating right now on something related to problems and uniting people around that. Let me know if you want to share your views on how you see it
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Arhat pfp
Arhat
@arhat
It shouldn’t be an issue to build one. Imagine Reddit conversations (forum) with knowledge depth being taken seriously by builders & contributors. A FC channel would work. Engagement compounds. Problems turns to idea. A “YC + (decentralized) Venture studio” mix. If anyone wants to build this, I have a draft.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kien 🙏 pfp
Kien 🙏
@kienfam
The value of the app should be in how to turn problems into ideas + gathering a team who is going to validate it before building. Discussions < custdev As you said, FC can work. I think we should follow the lean approach and just start with problems hashtag on FC Validate the assumption first
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction