JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
The highest value to Look for in Web 3: stakeholder Obsession. If it‘s true, you can passively hold, contribute time, Support in multiple ways. If a Team doesn‘t take care of stakeholders at 1 single point, run away. One thing is for certain: It will happen again. Web 2 has shareholders & Teams should have user obsession to accrue value to users & shareholders. Simple. Web 3 is a More complex Design, a Multi-agent System with more stakeholders. Not caring about one stakeholder Group means you don’t care about users, Clients, Partners, or simply people‘s life savings or their time. No respect for any of these is a no-go.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

antaur pfp
antaur
@antaur.eth
I ran a way months ago
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
Good Call. I initially lost interest after the weird launch that burned some buyers but gave it another shot when they kept building, adding value to the product (creator token network, ai) and had a solid focus on the Token too. Hence, can‘t blame them for interating & heavily experimenting towards pmf, but the latest move was unprovoked radical, simply destroying user/holder value. So, Q is do you always stay away when You See This behavior to Play Safe or do You Trade in and out when You See aggressive, Opportunistin but also Selfies behavior. And Even if you play it Safe, you‘ll get blindsided by Teams that do shit in crypto..
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

antaur pfp
antaur
@antaur.eth
my history is this: 1. made 1x on launch 2. faded it bc not interested 3. build position esp. fan tokens, staked them all 4. defended jason during maxi maxi nonsense 5. was curious about pivot to ai meta 6. was deeply underwhelmed by v1 7. didn't rate Jason's response to good faith critical feedback 8. tried app 2-3 times and was more underwhelmed 9. bought ai coins feeling FOMO 10. sold those at 30% loss when I realised this is all copy cat at best 11. rage quit (2nd time in 4 years) after a certain interaction 12. never looked back
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
Linda similar history: The App, System was always somewhat complicated and Jason initially saying it’s intentionally designed that way annoyed me too. I bought some fan tokens with my vesting but stayed away otherwise and felt it was okay-designed with revenue distribution - just demand/utility from creators was missing in the equation. After the steady selloff and end of vesting I thought we could gain some momentum and jt would be good idea to add ai (Funktionality) as utility to the creator coins. However, that never reflected. In fact, now that I think about it, fan token holders were already getting a surprise „fuck you“ when the System incentives we’re changed (though for good reasons: more sustainability). Tbh I tried the AI chat. It was okayish (while I wondered how it should work with the rest of the egosydten) and it made sense to simplify. Really no reason to Kick holders in the process & Frankly don’t see why it should win vs 100 others building the same
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction