Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Related: telling people you’re building an “onchain” app is like answering “withhammer” when people ask you what type of house you’re building A chain is a tool for economic coordination. It’s not the point of all this work we’re doing. If you fixate on the tool, you’ll never reach the real customer
6 replies
5 recasts
48 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
permissionless and interoperable are better words to describe onchain apps
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
“… and get this: it’ll be *onchain*”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti 🐘
@bleu.eth
@elefant make a haiku about this cast from android
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Complexlity
@complexlity
This. A lot of times, I feel web3 founders are not building for the product for for the hype. So using words like “onchain” rather that a clear description of what you’re building and what it solves helps build the hype probably good for them for raises, initial valuation and their token perceived value https://warpcast.com/pirosb3/0xa783afff
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🏰 Ξ2T
@earth2travis
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jorge Pablo Franetovic 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
for me, having this conversation with normies has been an ongoing process of peeling the layers of the onion “im building a farcaster client” is just noise on the eyes of my wife but then i show her an Instagram like feed and she says: “holy shit you created an Instagram clone”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
