Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/brypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen 🌲
@androidsixteen.eth
I hope the half-life of "smart coins" is shorter than that of "scene coins"
7 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
jihad ↑
@jihad
whether we like the term or not, i think it’s important that we create ones that serve the target audience
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
androidsixteen 🌲
@androidsixteen.eth
No, we need *fewer* in-group buzzwords
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
jihad ↑
@jihad
but both can be true! in-group buzzwords ≠labels that nudge people to build and use things as we intend a great label can lead people to get excited about the tech and think differently about how to craft products
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
androidsixteen 🌲
@androidsixteen.eth
I guess my point is that this is not a great label Smart as a modifier means nothing (or everything) and doesn't hone in on how these coins are different from the status quo So lacking semantic precision, the out-group (ie. the rest of crypto aside from Base/FC) discards it as yet another buzzword
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
jihad ↑
@jihad
yeah cc @saintless i think yall are right i am just frustrated by the lack of trying. “memecoin” is a broken, spoiled term. we shouldn’t call anything that isn’t a protocol token a memecoin. work to be done in the naming things dept https://warpcast.com/saintless.eth/0xdf392480
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
androidsixteen 🌲
@androidsixteen.eth
Hardest problem in computer science (and business, and life, and...) I appreciate your intellectual honesty and being willing to consider the counterpoint here My proposal would be to just go with "tokens" and rather than trying to create a category before the instances exist, help build / launch / foster a great token that has a revshare model. Then it can spawn the category in a more sustainable way The cart is ahead of the horse
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
john
@know
a scene that utilises a token in a novel/smart way
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
