Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/brypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Feels like Uniswap launched a chain 2 years too late -- nobody cares now Funny because Compound tried launching a chain 2 years too early (remember Gateway?)
4 replies
3 recasts
44 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
I still think Unichain attracts more liquidity than most L2s over time
4 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
soyboy
@soyboy
Unichain will be the L2 liquidity hub. Slap native op stack interop on that bad boy and you’ve got one slick Superchain
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett
@garrett
exactly
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
I think this is a nice idea, but it has failed in practice so far (osmosis in cosmos, acala / moonbeam in polkadot) Generally, the chain with liquidity also wants to keep you there for the additional take from apps -- I don't think the separation of concerns approach works, since liquidity is a winner take most / all game
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett
@garrett
Interop UX and tech has come a long way where the products are far better and easier to abstract away some of the complexities Uniswap is where a lot of liquidity is held in LP pools of tokens so if a mainnet token wants to migrate some liquidity to a L2 for cheaper fees to traders then Unichain should be the easiest choice. I could also imagine a future where Uni V5 has some hooks exclusive to Unichain or something like that. Liquidity is king, uniswap knows that.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
