Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Was talking to a founder friend yesterday who has looked into using FC as part of their gtm (they are a crypto infra co) He said the team came to the conclusion that 80% of the folks they could target here, they can get by targeting CT, hence it would be mostly redundant spend with little ROI I countered that it’s not the intersection that matters, but the difference. Meaning — the 20% of folks that are active here, but not active on Twitter, are the highest value cohort Reason being — it’s a different culture. This culture values authenticity and showing up for each other more than the general crypto population. Smaller quantity but much higher quality He grokked it but I could tell it would still be hard for him to get buy-in from the rest of his team. Sadly, I think this realization doesn’t scale well, but needs to be experienced or learned via wom from a trusted party Not sure how best to communicate “the vibes” other than one person at a time cc @kia.eth the resident vibe lord
13 replies
9 recasts
60 reactions
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
depends what this crypto infra is focused on. if it's for consumer apps or sth related to base, Farcaster seems like a good fit. but e.g., for zk i'd probably invest this time in being active in a few smaller zk communities
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
That's the other common misconception, that Farcaster and Base are coupled
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
They're not but Base is very present here so you can meet many Base builders on FC
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
