andric.eth pfp
andric.eth
@andric
Twitter fracturing into Farcaster (web3), Mastodon (serious), Poast (shitposting), Post (politics), and Truth Social (religion, conspiracy theories, white nationalism) is probably a good thing. These are divisive things incompatible with broadcast posting.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

andric.eth pfp
andric.eth
@andric
i.e. they are parts of your identity that you might not want to associate with your *only* identity. Twitter’s broadcast model where you follow people creates evolutionary pressure for people to adopt a singular identity. Or fracture it into alts. And that isn’t healthy.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

andric.eth pfp
andric.eth
@andric
There’s an asymmetry between the person who posts (who has multiple facets of their identity), and the person who follows them (who is interested in maybe one facet, at most). All things being equal, the follower’s preferences win out, because they dictate whether the poster gets heard.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

andric.eth pfp
andric.eth
@andric
Eventually, through some kind of random walk, you develop an identity that is molded by what your followers prefer, because should you post something that isn’t aligned with what they prefer, it doesn’t get heard anyway. So you go off in search of an alt social platform. Or create an alt.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction