Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alessandro Manfredi pfp
Alessandro Manfredi
@allemanfredi.eth
Using an Eigen Layer AVS to verify zk proofs is not a safe choice. What happens if the restaked amount is less than the amount secured by a proof? Verification must be done on-chain. At most, you can use an AVS to aggregate proofs
5 replies
1 recast
17 reactions

Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ pfp
Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ
@deanpierce.eth
Agreed that verifications should always happen on-chain. They're super cheap and that's kind of the point 😁 I do really like the idea of AVSs to make sure that the provers are on duty and doing their job though.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EmpiricalLagrange pfp
EmpiricalLagrange
@eulerlagrange.eth
Why not just do it multiple times to add up the security?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Saksham pfp
Saksham
@ouranostheos
Agreed its disguised under name soft finality. But maybe its still better than other L1s with centralized validator set
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Netherlands Official pfp
Netherlands Official
@netherlands
26 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction