Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alec Urtu
@alecurtu
We have entered an era where the value of art is determined by its ability to spread. Its worth stems from how extensively it is discussed, written about, and shared. As a work circulates more broadly, its value inevitably increases The true worth is merely a mirage, shaped by popular opinion rather than genuine merit
4 replies
1 recast
4 reactions
xdrian
@xdrian
Question: If a piece of art was exceptionally reasonable and in the woods, would anyone talk about it? Synonyms: Reviews, Word of mouth, and Folklore. Answer: With a 300,000 USD marketing investment, yes. Antonym: Out of sight out of mind Best Result: Big fish little pond
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Margaret Murphy
@margaretonline
Absolutely disagree — art that has mass appeal doesn’t equate value. Just because something is sold in ikea doesn’t make it good. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Papa Bear 🔵🐹🍖🧾🎭
@pbear988
I’m not an artist so forgive me But how would you define genuine merit? It seems to me that the popularity of a piece will, at least in some part, be a reflection of how much people enjoy it?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Yusuf Altunbıçak
@eyupyusufa
I think this applies not only to art, but to most things. Product, service, art, even food. If a dish is marketed very well and also gets praise from 2 friends, it will taste better for you than before. Everything is marketing.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction