Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
“what can i get from this” vs “what can we do with this” this is the yinyang aether put on display
2 replies
2 recasts
36 reactions
LGHT
@lght.eth
yinyang mental model works wonders for stuff like this imo the smaller paradoxical color (white inside black or vice versa) ≈ a representation of behavior that more closely resembles the half it’s nested within meaning someone could be ‘rude’ to a bot trying to figure out “what we can do with this” or someone could be ‘kind’ to a bot trying to figure out “what can i get from this” proportionate to the ratio of each circle, these paradoxical actions are the monitory imo ppl generally are kinda just the way they are. some minority use a suite of behavior for similar intentions tho
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Intent vs substance Harder to gauge intent without knowing the person. Hard to know the person without knowing the person (url vs irl)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
v challenging but if you are patient and keep data points it becomes clearer over time. the most pronounced moments of excitement (in either direction) provide the strongest clues in my xp
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Agree, but without long term memory (eg newcomers) how do u accurately read intent
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
wailing whimsi
@whimsi.eth
potentially use someone’s social graph as a proxy to filter your own exposure?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Newcomers have no or little social graph tho?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wailing whimsi
@whimsi.eth
newcomers would be using a big account they trust as a proxy the issue is just who they trust you can try offer suggestions as a platform, but we’ve seen that arc already play out with warpcast and the autofollow list on signup
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
