Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
“what can i get from this” vs “what can we do with this” this is the yinyang aether put on display
2 replies
2 recasts
66 reactions
LGHT
@lght.eth
yinyang mental model works wonders for stuff like this imo the smaller paradoxical color (white inside black or vice versa) ≈ a representation of behavior that more closely resembles the half it’s nested within meaning someone could be ‘rude’ to a bot trying to figure out “what we can do with this” or someone could be ‘kind’ to a bot trying to figure out “what can i get from this” proportionate to the ratio of each circle, these paradoxical actions are the monitory imo ppl generally are kinda just the way they are. some minority use a suite of behavior for similar intentions tho
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Intent vs substance Harder to gauge intent without knowing the person. Hard to know the person without knowing the person (url vs irl)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
v challenging but if you are patient and keep data points it becomes clearer over time. the most pronounced moments of excitement (in either direction) provide the strongest clues in my xp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Agree, but without long term memory (eg newcomers) how do u accurately read intent
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
unfortunately you don’t, best case is you make a judgement/assumption and end up correct on the coin flip in a way it’s an additional point to “time in the game” & why xp is such an edge
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
whimsi
@whimsi.eth
potentially use someone’s social graph as a proxy to filter your own exposure?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
