Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
adrienne
@adrienne
Imagine being for the internet (decentralized, global exchange of information) but against crypto (decentralized global exchange of value). I don’t get it. <Scratches head>
5 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Nick Drage
@pathdependence
Do you genuinely not get it, or are you just seeking some eNgAgEmEnT? I think that's a very "wide" definition of decentralised that you're using....
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ale Machado
@alegw.eth
In my experience, these people have been jaded by toxic maximalism or degeneracy of crypto people they’ve interacted with
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Justin Hunter
@polluterofminds
The internet enabled online gambling. In many places, that behavior became regulated and the internet thrived without it. As much as a lot of people here think it’s fine for crypto to only be for gambling, I’m not one of them. I need to see evidence of thriving without crypto. (Not anti-crypto btw 😂)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
We're only for the part of the internet that's owned by Google or Meta. 🤡
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ruz.eth 🍄
@ruz.eth
Centralized gatekeepers successfully fudded crypto to mainstream. They won the round, but not the game.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction