Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mike | Abundance šŸŒŸ pfp
Mike | Abundance šŸŒŸ
@abundance
In the age of AI, the Read-Write-Own narrative for content is dead. AI doesn't care if you tokenize your art, writing, or data. It's not going to buy your NFT. It will just extract all the value from your work, while you sit there with an empty bag. The solution to this lies in programming incentive structures based on an impact=profit model, so that it's more profitable for AI (or a network) to reward people based on their contribution than to try and extract value for free. How can paying for something be more profitable than getting it for free?! Because of the network effects you're creating; If Bitcoin didn't reward miners for their work, but just took the PoW hashes for free it wouldn't have $2T+ in value. Yet, it's meaningless to say that a Bitcoin miner *owns* a block; what matters is that they *earn* money for mining it.
4 replies
3 recasts
11 reactions

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
We have to redefine ownership. I think ppl are stuck in the "trademark/patent" mindset of ownership. Tokenizing your art, writing, and data is exactly how we can use incentive models for AI to drive value back to creators as rewards, and it has nothing to do with consumers buying/selling tokenized data directly. It should have no actual retail value, no trading or LP's with pump and dump incentives. Only data flow has value, like @sheldrake was saying. Everything about AI monetization is driven by tokens already. It's just a question of who gets the value of those token tx. The owner of the data does! If all the data an AI has is tokenized, then it's ready to reward the creators! The shift has to come in accepting that tokenization isn't for user activity, it's for backend activity. The UX in the web3 future will have no exposure to the tokens in the background, making it all work. https://paragraph.xyz/@trigs/the-attention-economy
1 reply
4 recasts
4 reactions

Mehdi Benembarek pfp
Mehdi Benembarek
@mehdi-benembarek
Very complex ā€¦ as it is in defining the paradigm shift from quantitative to qualitative, without faking quality. And maybe, only Historians in couple hundreds years from now (if Humanity still around) will be able to give it credibility
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
abundance mindset
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

downshift.thief pfp
downshift.thief
@downshift.eth
/microsub tip: 180 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction