Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Connor McCormick pfp
Connor McCormick
@nor
If you watch people on the edge of a field-of-knowledge the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis starts to seem obvious: otherwise why would the they need to keep inventing language?
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

a1z2 pfp
a1z2
@a1z2
Most specialized bodies of knowledge have developed their own descriptive language to talk about their subject. And that language allows them to think within that domain more concretely. But none of those specialized fields have developed their own grammar which influences their perception, as SWH articulates
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Leo ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต ๐Ÿงพ pfp
Leo ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต ๐Ÿงพ
@hyp
100 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction