Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Peter Kim
@peter
@perl announcement: Starting from tomorrow’s round (the round we post today), we will be filtering out the engagement of users that have placed a wager on a round. For example, if you place a pick, your likes will not count towards the round’s total to promote a fair game for everyone.
32 replies
7 recasts
149 reactions
3070 ✅
@3070.eth
wait what.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Peter Kim
@peter
let us know if you have any questions or feedback!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
3070 ✅
@3070.eth
just at a glance it feels like this approach is a bit weird. maybe the "Like Count"-based rounds should just filter for likes from power users. this way -> all voters likes count **indirectly** to feed the algo for discoverability. and then power users can like it if they discover it etc.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
3070 ✅
@3070.eth
I think this approach is better because the like counts can be publicly verified by anyone. whereas, if it filters out based on Perl-user opt-ins, an external entity can't assess the metrics (assumming Perl data is closed-off - not sure on this)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Peter Kim
@peter
this is good feedback, will take into consideration
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
