ripe↑
@ripe
maybe a dumb question, but why is it that clanker tokens generally have more liquidity/ higher market caps than zora tokens? is it just the visibility of deploying via social?
7 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Turii
@22cerodos
I think it is all based on how the Initial Mcap was made. I think Clanker starts with a 10ETH Mcap while Zora does 1Eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ripe↑
@ripe
possible to expand on that?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Turii
@22cerodos
I think this is how it works, maybe someone more experienced will be able to clarify. But here is what I have Identified: + Both start with 0 Eth and 1B Tokens on Pool + However Clanker's initial Mcap is 20k (Assuming Eth = 2k) +On the other hand Zora's initial Mcap is 2k. (both of this are set up by the Devs looking for the initial price of the token) +when 1,000 USD are bought. On Clanke'r it will have less Price impact than in Zora. I believe it would be 10x difference. So Prices spike higher on Zora with less amount bought. making less liquidity if they would have the same Mcap. as less money has come in into Zora In Clanker's first deployments they had the same initial liquidity of 1ETH but 1M supply and @proxystudio.eth saw this issue and change the token Mechanics. He may be able to give a better comprehensive and technical explanation
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
ripe↑
@ripe
super helpful info ty!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@carculture.eth
Thanks for this post. Could it also be that Clanker buys and holds more of the tokens and can parse them out to manage volatility. PS I think Zora contract allows them to change mcap. Could be wrong. Check me please
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
↑Dom
@onchaindom.eth
does the way the initial liquidity is handled differ?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction