maybe a dumb question, but why is it that clanker tokens generally have more liquidity/ higher market caps than zora tokens?

is it just the visibility of deploying via social?

I think it is all based on how the Initial Mcap was made. I think Clanker starts with a 10ETH Mcap while Zora does 1Eth

Lets make it again. from USD 100 to REKT. 

Curently 1k

Follow my likely failure journey at 
https://app.interface.social/22cerodos.eth

I think this is how it works, maybe someone more experienced will be able to clarify. But here is what I have Identified:

+ Both start with 0 Eth and 1B Tokens on Pool 
+ However Clanker's initial Mcap is 20k (Assuming Eth = 2k)
+On the other hand Zora's initial Mcap is 2k. 
(both of this are set up by the Devs looking for the initial price of the token)

+when 1,000 USD are bought. On Clanke'r it will have less Price impact than in Zora. I believe it would be 10x difference. 

So Prices spike higher on Zora with less amount bought. making less liquidity if they would have the same Mcap. as less money has come in into Zora

In Clanker's first deployments they had the same initial liquidity of 1ETH but 1M supply and @proxystudio.eth saw this issue and change the token Mechanics. He may be able to give a better comprehensive and technical explanation