A place for talking about the Ethereum Virtual Machine on Farcaster.

Doesn’t the fact that a smart contract wallet is transferable break the idea of a soul bound token?

SBTs are non-transferable, but if a contract wallet owns an SBT the wallet can be transferred to someone else.

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist and meme connoisseur.

/opacity
/eulerlagrange

yup. unimportant though. also SBTs are a shitty implementation of user-bound tokens (which is what most people want them for) because a user is not their address (a crazy idea, i know!)

+1, if you have a token that can be bound to multiple aspects of a person's identity (e.g. ENS, avatar, reputation, attendance, etc) then that's about as soul bound as we can get (you can still sell your identity and start fresh, but the barrier is sufficiently high).