Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
i’m still convinced that $nouns (nouns backed fungible token; for example 1 nouns = 1,000,000 $nouns) should happen if you have thoughts on the matter share them here in replies or dm me! unless there’s meaningful pushback i’m gonna start pushing for it harder soon
21 replies
0 recast
37 reactions
Satori
@0xsatori
I really feel like this should be integrated with NNS and $NOGS somehow
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wylin💎↑
@wylin
⬆️ no need to reinvent the wheel
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
well if the point is that $nogs is already a fungible token associated with nouns so we should use that i disagree. the main point here is to make a fungible token that you can redeem for nouns
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Satori
@0xsatori
$nogs is distributed directly based on participation though, isn’t that a solid foundation for earning a token redeemable for nouns? I guess a better question is - how do you see people earning this other new token?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Satori
@0xsatori
And don’t get me wrong I’m sure there are issues with this since it wasn’t the explicit mission from the get go, like rewarding gnars voting and nouns voting with the same amount is a little weird if $nogs can be redeemed for a noun. Just curious what ideal distribution methods look like to you
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction