Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
36 replies
3 recasts
66 reactions

nintynick.eth pfp
nintynick.eth
@nintynick.eth
All the value accrues to the social graph (Metcalfe’s law) As long as it’s actually open, it’s win-win
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
you mean the forkable social graph?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nintynick.eth pfp
nintynick.eth
@nintynick.eth
More that it is interoperable than forkable, but yes, forkable adds to credible commitments to openness
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction