Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ok so i finally understand impermanent loss and therefore why uniswap gives you a price range when you’re adding liquidity. such an interesting ux. maybe this will be the thing that makes it into a concept.
7 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
"impermanent" is hilarious because when the loss occurs its actually *very* permanent
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

sean 🔹 pfp
sean 🔹
@swabbie.eth
the simplest way to think about liquidity provisioning is that you’re placing many limit orders - either over a concentrated range or over the entire range (eg v2)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂  pfp
J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂
@jvaleska.eth
Osmosis has a great ux/ui too. I understood it in the same way, looking a similar "chart"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rob Sanchez pfp
Rob Sanchez
@robrecht
impermanent loss only takes into account the start and end price but LPs lose money on all the arbitrage that happens inbetween, the metric you want to track is loss vs rebalancing (LVR) here is a great 30m lecture on it if intersted
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
If you want vetted information on LPs, nir_un.twitter may have some tweets or threads that should be searchable. He's a giga chad when it comes to providing liquidity; usually does six figures worth of ETH:USDC and other popular tokens and is very open to sharing his insights on how to do them well.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dawufi pfp
dawufi
@dawufi
Wait until you find out about dynamic v3 liquidity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction