Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
apparently, the fda allows 20% variance on nutrition facts. if the food supply chain is onchain, we'd be able to see the exact ingredient sources and have dynamic food labels. https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x5abf0c04ab7196e2bdd19313b479baebd9f7791b/132
7 replies
3 recasts
179 reactions
pugson
@pugson
wouldnβt it just say the same thing as on the label?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
artman πΌοΈπ§Ύππ©
@altanon
they also do that 0% sugar trick on foods when itβs below a certain amount
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
meta-davidπ© | Building Scoop3
@metadavid
Working on video for this π«‘ 125 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Super Tight Woody
@supertightwoody
Hell yeah 150 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
silv
@silv.eth
while itβs true FDA allows 20% variance, the origin of the nutrition data used on nutrition fact label (NFP) can come from either lab analysis or recipe database software. commodity food suppliers like tomato growers will not have expensive lab analysis done on their tomatoes
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cryptocellaris.eth π©
@cryptocellaris
this is a cool idea, but would require at a minimum analytical chemistry quantitation of the products ingredients which adds substantial cost also, it's generally destructive so would only work on homogenized batch ingredients tbf mass produced factory food does meet these conditions and has in house lab tests anyway
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cinema Ninja π₯π₯·
@cinemaninja
Dam thats crazy!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
