Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
psychographic personas are a massive and underrated design unlock. i'll demonstrate why, using michael saylor and ansem as examples for a trading product:
7 replies
4 recasts
68 reactions

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
users should be at the core of every design decision. but how do you do that, exactly? by creating fictional characters based on real data to tell compelling stories about user needs.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

axek pfp
axek
@axek
At scale personas always end up being almost fictional characters and barely represent real users. Individual users suffer based on how close they are to the average. Like if you measure every pilot and create a cockpit for an average pilot, it wouldn't fit any of the pilots. Just like t-shirts sized S, M, L, etc
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

qimchi pfp
qimchi
@qimchi
It’s 4 am and I’m reading a banger You can also be expect a DM
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

🏰 Ξ2T pfp
🏰 Ξ2T
@earth2travis
Understanding what a person does and why is much more important than knowing their age and gender
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

weaatherlight✈ pfp
weaatherlight✈
@aa
1 $degen for all the Timmys, Johnnys, Spikes and Vorthoses out there
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

welter pfp
welter
@fun
rly good design psychology thread, saved for later
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Raunaq  pfp
Raunaq
@friendly
This is so interesting, I'd love to implement this as I'm already experiencing a dichotomy when designing my AI companion for crypto. Are there any resources you use to gather indicators for what your user psychographics might be? And, what's a good way to test whether you're doing a good job for the psychographic?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction