July
@july
1781 Following
215153 Followers
5 replies
5 recasts
56 reactions
2 replies
4 recasts
28 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
15 reactions
3 replies
10 recasts
56 reactions
2 replies
6 recasts
35 reactions
1 reply
2 recasts
16 reactions
7 replies
23 recasts
94 reactions
0 reply
7 recasts
27 reactions
2 replies
9 recasts
47 reactions
4 replies
3 recasts
36 reactions
5 replies
5 recasts
73 reactions
2 replies
1 recast
32 reactions
5 replies
4 recasts
115 reactions
6 replies
8 recasts
70 reactions
3 replies
3 recasts
38 reactions
But that being said, I think the modern day and age that we live in, the Big Other - in its old definition -- feels monolithic, antiquated in retrospect. In many ways - its the reason that "The Rhizome" was such an interesting idea (by Deleuze and Guattari) where pre-blockchain / everything, they really explored how an alternative mode of organization of things, something dynamic, changing, decentralized, and open-ended and could exist as a sort of antithesis to the ever increasing centralized mode of power / old world bureacracy.
In many ways I think they were able to see the old arborescent hierarchical structure, as being replaced by this many incandescent, different, decentralized ways of organizing things (both physical and digital) which we've seen with the rise of the internet, and the way that we share information in the world today
This Lacanian Big Other, has, duplicated too, and in Deluzian terms, become 'rhizomatic' - yet we are almost still stuck in thinking its monolithic 0 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
Another thing Kubler talks about is this idea of "Aesthetic Fatigue" - which is an intuitive idea, but nice to have a name to it -- sort of like how societies, cultures, individuals etc, the mob, if you will, experiences this sense of tiredness or saturation, with certain forms and/or patterns of expression over time, and people just get tired of it
This "aesthetic fatigue" can lead to the obsolescence of those forms as they lose their appeal and meaning - which I think it interesting because then this is how we end up with this need, or desire, for new things, for newer pastures, there is no stopping, only the next thing and the next thing - which sounds tiring, but I think that's taking a simplistic view 3 replies
4 recasts
45 reactions
4 replies
2 recasts
60 reactions
2 replies
4 recasts
52 reactions
3 replies
1 recast
23 reactions