The negation game is a tool for decision making in adversarial contexts

This is a home for its builders and users

https://negationgame.com

Main

Recent

negationgame

Accountability market. 

- Projects/builders post their assumptions, possibly with suggestions on what could prove that assumption wrong, aka prompts for researchers 

- hypotheses are then posted with references to which assumptions are feeding the hypothesis 

- anyone can stake value onto these posts to indicate how much it would be worth it to them to have the assumption vetted or the hypothesis tested

- prediction market style voting occurs on the legitimacy of assumptions and hypothesis creates incentive for people to be active in proving and disproving results

Something crazy like that. @nor prob has a better structure for this.

@trigs offered a pretty impressive summary of the negation game mechanics from memory

Decentralizing infrastructure with Kleomedes |

Building collaboration with Nearchos |

/octant Community Grants Council |

/colinks-and-co CoDAO Council

On the need for new games of science and impact funding

On the need for new games of science and impact funding
https://x.com/Jabaluck/status/1827473561289621685?t=UX5o9L3kMwJZ0g_CL5gSTw&s=09

We're planning a rebuild of the negation game.

We're not going to build on top of Farcaster this time because:
A) it's harder to onboard non-fc users 
B) we don't get much fc usage
C) fc puts constraints on us (perf, can't edit)
D) there's not much benefit from points on fc, or casts in ng
E) notifications in fc don't seamlessly point ppl to the negation game interface, and points look bad in fc

At Shakespeare and Company in Paris, you can find classic literature in various languages.

The continued importance of credibly neutral dispute processes

The continued importance of credibly neutral dispute processes
https://x.com/SeanEcom/status/1818352322759827553

Just rediscovered @negationgame, its much cooler now than i remember

There should be an economic cost associated with the Report Cast button

If you want to report something, you have to stake a certain amount

If others agree with you then you get your stake back, if its an outlier and you're just complaining for a non issue the report is ignored and your stake is slashed

Would love an analysis @nor

https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/the-web3-governance-lab/

cc @eddy

CTO @a16zcrypto, lover of https://github.com/a16z/awesome-farcaster

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

@nor the business model of review sites usually revolves around catering to the supply side of the market, since users won’t pay to access feedback.

Wondering if you have any ideas on how to construct a market where users a incentives to leave honest feedback

Screenshot essay excerpt: the importance of falsifiability in science

Screenshot essay excerpt: the importance of falsifiability in science
https://coda.io/@connor/epistemic-leverage

is there any possible way the chain can solve spam email and telemarketing

maximum respect for those capable of finding out that they're wrong

maximum respect for those capable of finding out that they're wrong

https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxf5TzzQ8yqmuhoAaEZLkrgy6DJTelrGyQ?si=IgdFspDTP5Z46sZX

Really fun working session yesterday on the Negation Game mechanism set.

In this thumbnail I achieved a look of optimal derangement and optimism

Really fun working session yesterday on the Negation Game mechanism set.

In this thumbnail I achieved a look of optimal derangement and optimism

https://youtu.be/oxX97qF1YN0