balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
Farcaster is a single-tribe network, not a social network. Big difference.
15 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

Dylan Field pfp
Dylan Field
@zoink
I do wonder how quickly networks need to become multi-tribe to stay relevant for the long term
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
One thesis is that we are entering the age of "network defect" — where the disalignment you get from squabbling tribes outweighs the advantage of having them all on one platform. If so, we may need to make single-tribe networks more *useful* for doing things. Example: a designer guild network integrated with Figma
5 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

Dylan Field pfp
Dylan Field
@zoink
IMO "design" is made up of many tribes actually — but interesting point on the pendulum swinging away from aggregation
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
Yeah, agree — the clustering might not be by profession, but by ideology across professions. Though some professions may very disproportionately lean towards one ideology or another.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nirbhik.eth pfp
nirbhik.eth
@nirbhik
Indeed, we’re moving into more single-tribe network. I keep pondering on this and the value of such micro communities is enormous. More value, less noise!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction