Science

Quantum mechanics has this extreme intellectual sheen, and disagreeing with the orthodoxy is a surefire way to self-recategorize as a crank. The layers of lindy thinking accumulate into unquestionable dried crusts that seminarians are instructed to accept on faith so they can join the church of shut up and calculate.

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

Incredibly mid curve take lmao

QM is still exceptionally hotly contested so much that recent winners of 2022 Nobel were trying to poke holes in it as you mentioned in your video in the thread

I don’t get the negativity here — QM continues to stun scientists that it’s an accurate description of the world

Building puzzle.online //

Fixing capitalism and making private property fun again //

It ain’t much, but it’s honest work

Your OG take wasn’t that

Your OG take was that disagreement with QM labels you a crank to which I pointed out that this is very not true as evidenced by the 2022 Nobel prizes

I agree with what you’re saying about interpretation mattering, but this now just feels like engagement bait

One man's wizard is another man's mid curve.

I'm not disagreeing with the math of quantum mechanics — its predictions are accurate. I'm disagreeing with the interpretation. And I think interpretation matters because it has implications, ranging from algorithm design to security to worldview.