Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
I almost never trust a rating system that includes decimals, high degree of variance there, rarely consistent
7 replies
2 recasts
42 reactions
Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
Related: ten point rating systems are often unreliable, ideal would be to standardize on four so that respondents are forced to decide slightly positive or negative In many cases (like ridesharing and food delivery) it makes even more sense to just have a quick 👍🏻 / 👎🏻 since most ratings lack nuance anyway
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
one bite, everybody knows the rules
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
I don't mind it for IMDb. It provides a nicer stack rank suitable for the size of the population being ranked (all movies ever made).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
I 97.9864200000000001% agree
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Munawar Hussain pfp
Munawar Hussain
@munawar1
I agreed 💯
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
eugen 🎭🍄 pfp
eugen 🎭🍄
@madvac
anything above a 5.56789 is just pure chaos, right?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Igor pfp
Igor
@ign999
you think correctly😎
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sheena pfp
Sheena
@sheena
Never thought of it like this before 👍🏻 solid
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goga pfp
Goga
@gogasnake
It's understandable to be skeptical of rating systems that use decimals. The high degree of variance can make it difficult to trust the consistency and reliability of the ratings. Whole numbers often provide a clearer and more straightforward assessment, reducing the ambiguity associated with minor differences.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction