Farcaster

What is the most frustrating thing about Farcaster right now?

Reply and like the replies from others that resonate.

I’ll only ask clarifying questions (ie I won’t tell you you’re wrong) and then respond to a dozen or so top answers in a video this weekend with how we think about it.

I feel that signers are a ticking bomb. Very low visibility on what signed with with signer, who has a signer you have approved, what will happen if you remove it, etc. Maybe it's my OCD (I only have it for this type of things), but it stops me from feeling free to use stuff.

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), /weatherxm (work), @l--o--l (fun). Also https://paragraph.xyz/@purplesubmarine

Yeah I know it’s technically challenging but granular signer permissions would be dope, allows devs to build mini apps that focus on specific parts of the FC experience with reduced potential for abuse

cypherpunk wannabe, engineer working on @frames /open-frames /opencast
https://stephancill.co.za create stories at https://stories.steer.fun

/new-york by day 🗽 /latenightcrew by night :) Fan of eating tacos and bringing people together, often at the same time 🌮

Sure. But maybe the existing design, with some small (...) modifications and better tools, could improve things a lot. 

For example an inactive state for signers that prevents them from being used after a certain point in time, but does not invalidate messages. Or a polished, battle-tested version of @stephancill's signer-tools that comes as a stand-alone app. Things like that would make me feel much more comfortable.