Zeen Train on Warpcast

Zeen Train pfp

Thread to talk about tidbits I found interesting

1 reply

0 recast

8 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

It’s very hard to succinctly articulate the arrogance of the noble class particularly close to the revolution. The closest thing I can get is that Queen Victoria wrote her granddaughter (the Tsarina) and she responded like the people didn’t matter

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

The arrogance may have been warranted if the nobles were truly to smartest people but they weren't! By WW1, most of the ranking officers were just bourgeois nobles who didn't earn their titles They just followed the bureaucratic path set by the table of ranks and boom your were a general

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

The nobles refused to adapt to capitalism as well creating rifts between nobles with "old power" and the new merchant close with monetary power The Cherry Orchard by Chekov is a great example of this theme

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Zeen Train pfp

I didn't realize the emancipation of the serfs was partially a way for nobles to hand off debt to poor peasants With most nobles loaded up on debt, they offered emancipation and land grants but required the peasants to take on the debts that the nobles incurred. Thereby reducing their burden and exchanging serfdom for indentured servitude

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

The Go to the People movement ethos really captured 2 groups, the Slavophilia of people like Dostoevsky and the revolutionaries / Marxists / socialists looking for a better future

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Zeen Train pfp

It's easy to see especially why young women were so keen to join revolutionary circles based on the peasant cultural tradition. Intensely patriarchal, they had some intense sayings such as: "The more you beat the old woman, the tastier the soup will be" "A wife is nice twice: when she's brought into the house as a bride and when she's carried out of it to her grave"

4 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

But starting in 1905, more violence was taking place in the country side against the nobles / gentry. Slaughtering families, taking land, killing animals, etc. Large mobs of disenchanted men looking to cause trouble

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Zeen Train pfp

There is a certain level of anarchy that is hard to relate to today. When the October Revolution occurred, bringing the Bolsheviks to power, no one really cared. Everyone went on with their days outside of central St. Petersberg The closest thing I can think of is this video of people cycling during the war in Ukraine https://x.com/adamcurtisbroll/status/1805633291900404104

2 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

Effectively, a coup was launched and no one cared?? The amount of apathy towards the provisional government would have to be astronomical for something like that to happen In America today, the closest thing we may have is January 6th. But everyone cared about that, not a soul just "kept moving forward"

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

Also Lenin was one hell of an individual in leading the October revolution but he is morally ambiguous at best. He directly endorsed terrible violence towards others and miscalculated volatility after the revolution, leading to more unnecessary deaths

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Adam pfp

Fantastic thread, but would strongly disagree that everyone cared about January 6. They absolutely should have, but many who were aligned with the ideology that let it happen in the first place kept on moving, which is why you have people either in denial that it happened, or don’t see it as the historic event that it was and are willing to support the same candidate that inspired it in the first place.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction