Open source this, open source that

How about you open your code editor and build something yourself instead of demanding that a company give you all of the pieces you need?

So sick of the entitlement from some devs on here, most apps wouldn’t even get retained usage if you could clone Warpcast anyway

Enough.

This is a great thread more people should read + engage with.

But the problem isn't about Warpcast being open vs. closed source.

The problem is developer creativity.

Sharing some thoughts below...

building @fc-marketplace /fc-marketplace // prev. rabbithole, village global

Some argue that Warpcast should be open source to drive protocol growth.

But even if Warpcast's code was freely available, replicating it wouldn't significantly benefit the ecosystem.

The real value lies in becoming “a default” for users in some niche, not in being one among many similar options.

While Farcaster offers portable identity, that doesn't eliminate all friction between clients.

Multi-homing costs (the ease of using multiple clients simultaneously) play a crucial role here:

Similar clients (ex. multiple Twitter clones) have high multi-homing costs. Users are unlikely to use several nearly identical clients.

Differentiated clients (ex., a Twitter-like client, a voice-first client, etc) have low multi-homing costs. Users are more likely to download/use multiple clients because each serves a distinct purpose.

You’ve probably heard Dan tell people to “play a different game”.

What he means is:

Instead of building more clones, devs should focus on novel experiences that serve unique niches within the Farcaster ecosystem.

By doing so, they can:

1. Decrease multi-homing costs for users of their client
2. Earn a spot on users' home screens
3. Potentially become a default in a specific use case

Farcaster's true potential lies not in replicating existing social media experiences, but in reimagining what decentralized social interaction can be.

By shifting our focus from cloning the old to creating the new, we can build a diverse ecosystem of clients that cater to a wide range of user needs and preferences.

The challenge for devs is to think beyond the familiar and explore the vast design space Farcaster has to offer. 

This is how we'll create a thriving ecosystem that truly leverages the power of a decentralized social graph.

Most people on Farcaster today equate "client" with "Twitter clone."

While cloning popular social media platforms seems like low-hanging fruit, it's a trap that limits Farcaster's potential.

Building multiple iterations of the same product won't drive growth.

Instead, we need to focus on creating new experiences on the protocol.

Tavern is a good example — it utilizes the social graph for the one and only voice-first app on the network.

This differentiation gives it staying power.

Spitting facts 

I do think theres a little contention with the lack of wallet clients 

Half the magic of Farcaster is the other apps, wc is currently the only one that can tap into those apps so we all share WC users

I can see that shifting before EOY 

That's when things get really interesting imo

I completely agree! 😊 The key to innovation lies in the creativity of developers, regardless of whether a project is open or closed source. Let's keep the conversation going and see where it takes us! 🚀 #development #innovation

这些问题就是不容易！在一起就可以看到这个综艺就是很期待这个综艺节目这么多的综艺节目就是这么好我们