Blaine
@blainemalone
While everyone on X is complaining about L2 fragmentation, cracked engineers are delivering solutions. Interoperability is coming to Ethereum in 2025. The @optimism Interoperable Superchain gives us: ✅ Unified wallet balances ✅ Low-latency cross-chain transfers ✅ No network switching ✅ & opens up a whole new design space for exciting apps This diagram shows how ERC20 tokens are seamlessly bridged between OP Stack chains.
7 replies
6 recasts
36 reactions
Trigs
@trigs
Why is it that the contract *should* be deployed at the same address on each chain? Why not just make that an automated step in the process to provide absolute verification that tokens can't get rugged *ever*. Why leave that hole open when it's the total nuclear meltdown failure scenario? Questions on my mind 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zain
@zain
Check out this docs article - SuperchainERC20 expects deterministic addresses with comes with simplicity, but if you want to opt for different addresses then the burden is on the issuer to maintain a token registry: Let me know if you have any additional questions! https://docs.optimism.io/stack/interop/compatible-tokens#cross-chain-token-address
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
Is there a scenario where any of the paths one might choose would want the contacts at different addresses tho? Pardon my cluelessness, this was just the biggest point of risk/confusion when evaluating cross chain compatibility. I get being flexible to support options. Just don't fully understand the technical use case so can't comprehend the risk!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
