ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
thank me later ๐Ÿซก acquired.fm/episodes/lvmh โ€œIf you control your factories, you control your quality. If you control your distribution, you control your image.โ€ ps @les and @slowcrypto, have you listened?
7 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

๐Ÿ—ฟ ๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’‚๐’” pfp
๐Ÿ—ฟ ๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’‚๐’”
@bias
What about those who arenโ€™t impressed by LVMH?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐ŸŒน zach harris ๐Ÿฅ€ pfp
๐ŸŒน zach harris ๐Ÿฅ€
@zachharris.eth
Iโ€™m more impressed by the fact they had the balls to hire Virgil Ablogh and Pharrell as their first ever black creative directors. Their Fly, Sail, Travel New York show from a few years ago was pretty impressive too. But generational wealth is the greatest unlock to the war-chest required for vertical integration.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐Ÿ—ฟ ๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’‚๐’” pfp
๐Ÿ—ฟ ๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’‚๐’”
@bias
If you look at pre-existing worldly trends surrounding those hires the decision to hire starts to look exactly like: pandering to stay relevant. Iโ€™d have been impressed had they hired any of those humans before years of unrest and injustice had pushed those cultural trends into the public eye.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐ŸŒน zach harris ๐Ÿฅ€ pfp
๐ŸŒน zach harris ๐Ÿฅ€
@zachharris.eth
Sure, I suspect part of it is hopping on the cultural trend bandwagon. But future proofing their sales addressable market and expanding it to a new unduplicated audience that is more liquid, than their heritage๏ฟผ CLTV, is prob part of the agenda as well. Iโ€™ve never run a $434.75 billion market cap company, have you?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐Ÿ—ฟ ๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’‚๐’” pfp
๐Ÿ—ฟ ๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’‚๐’”
@bias
I have not, and I kinda see that market cap as a perversion and truly wouldnโ€™t ever want to get to that place with anything I might run. You could argue that smells like a monopoly of sorts, even if itโ€™s a โ€œculturalโ€ monopoly. I think such things deserve to be obliterated: decentralize cultural monopolies.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction