Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
s3unha
@ho
Any takes on Dagon? What does this enable that wasn't possible before? P.S. Is Ross on WC? https://twitter.com/z0r0zzz/status/1747496774342955459
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
TommyJo
@tommyjo.eth
Only half way through and wrapping my head around it... but there's something here....
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ross
@z0r0z
yep, happy to answer any qs! Those are the two main examples that come to mind. Namely, an ERC20 DAO and a multisig. Where these are both technically accounts that use another standard (1271) they can hook into a common source of truth for voting. They can also configure to execute things based on Dagon's feedback.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
s3unha
@ho
1. Where does the inspiration for the name come from? I'm familiar with the god Dagon and wondered if it's in the lines of Moloch, Baal, etc or if there was something you intended there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagon
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
s3unha
@ho
2. Am I correct in understanding that Dagon is better because a) more efficiency b) easier to buildโless surface area for errors c) more governance abstraction than pre-existing solutionsโGnosis Zodiac or any other DAO platform?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
s3unha
@ho
It seems like Dagon makes Minion or Zodiac modules a thing of the past. Dagon's are extremely flexible when it comes to governance and you'd prefer to summon using Dagon first. Is this an accurate take? BTW thanks for answering. ๐
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ross
@z0r0z
Well, I would say it's a lot easier! The other thing Dagon really leans into and anticipates is the movement of users into smart contracts. I expect this implementation to evolve in line with standards like 4337 and 3074, in keeping with idea that Dagon is an app for accounts, that may become groups or entire networks.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
