Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
s3unha
@ho
Any takes on Dagon? What does this enable that wasn't possible before? P.S. Is Ross on WC? https://twitter.com/z0r0zzz/status/1747496774342955459
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
TommyJo
@tommyjo.eth
Only half way through and wrapping my head around it... but there's something here....
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ross
@z0r0z
yep, happy to answer any qs! Those are the two main examples that come to mind. Namely, an ERC20 DAO and a multisig. Where these are both technically accounts that use another standard (1271) they can hook into a common source of truth for voting. They can also configure to execute things based on Dagon's feedback.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
s3unha
@ho
1. Where does the inspiration for the name come from? I'm familiar with the god Dagon and wondered if it's in the lines of Moloch, Baal, etc or if there was something you intended there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagon
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
s3unha
@ho
2. Am I correct in understanding that Dagon is better because a) more efficiency b) easier to build—less surface area for errors c) more governance abstraction than pre-existing solutions—Gnosis Zodiac or any other DAO platform?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
s3unha
@ho
It seems like Dagon makes Minion or Zodiac modules a thing of the past. Dagon's are extremely flexible when it comes to governance and you'd prefer to summon using Dagon first. Is this an accurate take? BTW thanks for answering. 😄
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ross
@z0r0z
(Following up here ~~) Yes. That's correct. Dagon is the only design around (afaik) that offers governance as a sort of feature overlay. And aims to allow tokens to be updated as a strategy. Because it's a single contract instance that offers this to many accounts, it is more efficient in many ways than existing.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
