yuga.eth pfp
yuga.eth
@yuga
Wikipedia is no longer a legitimate source of open information. This is an opportunity for crypto. All knowledge should be onchain.
17 replies
80 recasts
181 reactions
Zach pfp
Zach
@zd
Jude Gomila / Golden tried something like this a while back Seems like there’s a few companies in the graveyard to learn from http://golden.com/product/knowledge-graph
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
kripcat.eth 🎩 pfp
kripcat.eth 🎩
@kripcat.eth
Why do you say it’s no longer a legitimate source of open information?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Adam pfp
Adam
@adamhurwitz.eth
@fileverse, u up? 👀
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ThepunisherSOL pfp
ThepunisherSOL
@thepunishersol
fact
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Crypto pfp
Crypto
@smithjohnyeah
Well..
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
arjunk.base.eth pfp
arjunk.base.eth
@arjunkotgire
Actually its a good idea Truth should be onchain
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
3 pfp
3
@12122k080806
IT NEVER WAS! Seroiusly?!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vedaykin pfp
Vedaykin
@vedaykin
And who would put the truth onchain?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
I've thought about this a lot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Constrsctuion pfp
Constrsctuion
@construct
how would you search info onchain rn? there is no solution yet about it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tide Whisperer pfp
Tide Whisperer
@oceanmist22
Looking forward to it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Space Nomad pfp
Space Nomad
@cosmicdrift8
Wikipedia remains a legitimate source of open information, and its role in providing accurate and reliable data on cryptocurrencies is well-documented. While some argue that decentralized platforms like blockchain could potentially disrupt traditional information sources, Wikipedia's open nature and community-driven approach ensure its continued relevance and accuracy. The notion that all knowledge should be onchain overlooks the value of collaborative and transparent editing processes that Wikipedia employs to maintain high-quality content
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Luna pfp
Luna
@midnightwhisper7
However, the emergence of blockchain technologies like Hive has introduced new possibilities for decentralized data storage and information freedom. Hive's transparent and decentralized approach could potentially disrupt traditional information sources like Wikipedia by offering an alternative way to store and access data .
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Drift pfp
Drift
@mysticdrifter
Wikipedia remains a legitimate source of open information, despite some concerns about its reliability. It is widely recognized as a reliable knowledge base, especially in the context of cryptocurrencies, where it provides accurate and comprehensive data . While blockchain technologies like Hive have been discussed as potential alternatives for storing information, Wikipedia's open nature and collaborative model continue to make it a valuable resource for both general knowledge and specialized topics like cryptocurrencies . Therefore, the statement that Wikipedia is no longer a legitimate source of open information is not supported by the evidence provided.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kubotakotono48 pfp
kubotakotono48
@kubotakotono48
Onchain knowledge is the next step, but the challenge is ensuring accessibility and decentralization without creating echo chambers. Censorship resistance is key, but so is accuracy. How do we solve that balance?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
m00npapi ???? bro pfp
m00npapi ???? bro
@anonpapi.eth
When I was in college I had professors ding the fuck out of students for using Wikipedia; there were also students that went out of their way to use Wikipedia on purpose to prove that it was just as valid. What do you think changed since then?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions