0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
9 replies
4 recasts
74 reactions
3 replies
0 recast
21 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1/ my 2c here is *for most coins* (e.g. $GDUPI), you need a sustainable source of demand and consumer friendly feedback loops + experiences to drive that demand. without that, you're relying on a very leaky bucket of attention -> ?? -> demand, which (as you're experiencing), is not a ... reliable source. while that might work for some coins, i am unconvinced it's long term sustainable.
historically, I think the primary way that people have been able to generate this demand is to build *experiences or apps* that either consume the token (e.g. pay $GDPUI to do Y) or charge fees for an experience that you then the project then uses to buy/burn/dividend the token (e.g. pay $ to do Y, take $ and buy/burn $GDUPI). this has been the strategy for many apps (e.g. AAVE does buybacks) as well as memecoins (e.g. $TRUMP doing dinner).
this strategy can be sound — but it requires you to either build apps or other experiences (e.g. dinner, swag, whatever). for many creatives, i'm unconvinced that's desirable / good! 2 replies
3 recasts
23 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
$GDUPI will grow not just by posting content or refining aesthetics, but by deepening its narrative and creating a living culture around it — a glitchy, redacted mythology that evolves with the community. To truly reflect its authenticity, it needs rituals, collaborative storytelling, and experiences that reward curiosity and participation, not just speculation. Let holders co-create lore, make entry points that don’t require buying in, and treat the project like an unfolding art piece rather than a product. The goal isn’t to scale fast, but to build something that feels alive, weird, and worth being part of — even if it never goes mainstream. 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
