Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
woj
@woj.eth
interesting warning in proposals is it a vulnerability? what's the exact risk here?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
Simplified: wag believes the Fork mech will make nouns treasury spiral to zero over time bc of arb opportunity and game theoretical reasons But for everyone who dont want to rely on Foundation veto ~forever, the Fork mech does not pose much of a difference (just another flavor of 51% attack)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
woj
@woj.eth
i see, thanks for the context does it mean that deploying the treasury faster is the only way to prevent the arbitrage attacks?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
yes, atleast i think thats one natural conclusion to ”combat” the arb others have looked into timelocking funds (@yitong?) but (until the dao is fully captured) its also possible to explore other dao immune systems mechanics to combat arbers, eg slashing or ragekick
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Yitong
@yitong
Yeah I think Krel’s summarized my position pretty well - I do think there’s a potential of a repeat, but it’s not so obvious that we need to be pre-empt it. Rather focus our energy on enjoying and building until the need for défense is evident
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺
@benbodhi
I can’t help but feel like that “need for defence is evident” moment was like 9 months ago.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction