Yhprum pfp

Yhprum

@yhprumslaw

76 Following
6 Followers


Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
one of my favorite listens this year, and a new fan of @jackson and his podcast + the unbelievable site that actually lets me just read transcripts
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
earlier today I was playing with Gemini 2.5 Pro, and it’s real good. like really good, but again if your style of running your company is decision by committee. good luck thinking about the consumer and winning when the innovation curve is an asymptote and virality is everything.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
thinking about why llms aren't considered funny. if we look at how kantian humor is driven by intentional incongruity/laughter arising from recognizing a mismatch between expectation and reality + how LLMs work it's a little clear why llms struggle to be universally funny👇
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
@dwr.eth new here and trying to figure out where people hang out (like old tpot equivalent), how do you suggest jumping around farcaster to find stuff you like? on x i tend to write mostly about tech/philosophy intersection, but i love the promise of this being on chain and am struggling to build a new follower graph. I’ve seen some spaces and or communities that start with a / but i use warpcaster and it’s a bit unintuitive to figure out what’s isomorphic and what’s different and new (love how money can move through protocols for example like bracky) my x for reference: https://x.com/yhprums_law/status/1904021255830774174?s=46
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
no clue if I’m right but guessing from reading this that it’s some type of tensor splitting where a model is shared across nodes. no one holds the full weight set—each gets a tensor chunk, like a weight matrix slice, cutting comms to 1-5MB/step over slow nets.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
going off my thoughts yesterday comparisons lisps to web3 composability, it wasn't that lisp lacked a mechanism for coordination; it's that the primary focus was on software development itself. the incentives were geared towards individual expressiveness and building powerful tools, not necessarily towards enforcing widespread adoption of a single standard across projects. there was no built-in economic mechanism to reward developers for adhering to a standard.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
composability, that seemingly magical ability to seamlessly combine different decentralized applications and protocols, is the defining characteristic of web3, really reminds me of the power of macros in lisp. in lisp, macros aren't mere functions; they are code that writes code, allowing developers to extend the very language itself at compile time. this yields unparalleled flexibility, enabling the creation of highly specialized, domain-specific languages (dsls) within lisp. however, this power came with a trade-off: a tendency towards fragmentation. different projects developed their own "dialects," often incompatible, diverging from a unified standard.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
this is kind of a beautiful place, reminds me a lot of early early twitter. very heavy first mover medium. it’s funny to see how much of the internet's take on farcaster focuses on how there’s no one here and people just talk about farcaster.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
@bracky I want in on the Madness! 🏀
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yhprum pfp
Yhprum
@yhprumslaw
everything that can work, will work
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction