CT = VCs / investors / biggest shillers with large followings

Farcaster = users / builders with large followings

think this is what leads to lots of the division when it comes to farcaster and apps in general on crypto twitter. 99% of the time thoughts are bag bias and it’s going to very had to change a persons mind who doesn’t have sitg

I fall victim to this sometimes too but trying to be more aware of it because I generally believe that a rising tide lifts all boats

For sure.

A more simple cast would have been you don’t always need sitg to like something and just cause you don’t have sitg you don’t need to make baseless claims

And that’s kind of my point ct has heaviest bags so loudest which makes it much more tribal and I think ultimately hurts growth for apps 

I’m not saying it’s has to be only “happy vibes” think healthy conversation / debate is great. 

Also was a post to remind myself

isn’t bag bias evidence of sitg tho? like people have put capital or time towards an idea on CT and are biased towards their view. It doesn’t feel structurally different from people putting capital or time towards an idea on here

Arguably the “user” POV has the least skin in the game

people are often pushing narratives that align with their investments or portfolios

Good distinction. 

I wonder how much of this framework is due to that fact that the current bags don’t *do* actual things. If they did, I wonder if some conversations would be a little more objective. Eg:

“Do you like using $bracky? Or don’t you?”

[Whatever they think.]

“Fair enough!”