zkSync

Judging by the loud cries of millions of sybils on Twitter, zkSync chose the optimal criteria for filtering them out.

Is holding $100 in the ecosystem for a year not a fair criterion for a regular user?

In other airdrops, it might be POH with a well-established Farcaster or Lens profile. Are you ready for such changes?

😨 /fomies 🧐 /etherschool 📔 /diaries 💼 /hodler 🏋️ /gymvibes 🛫 /traveljunkie 🦜 /lingoleague

I think the distribution is unfair, the number of eligible wallets are many times less than other tier-1 projects (although ZK got record investments)

  The ratio between the least allocation and the biggest one (from 914 to 100k) is more than 100x, looks like a concentration not a decentralisation

Regen anon learning and sharing /crypto stuff. /sendit /higher /ethereum /base /data

Looking at the amount of tokens distributed to each subset (instead of the amount of wallets) we have something like this:
- ~78.5% - 2.673b tokens distributed to 183 808 wallets (each, earning 3k or more tokens)
- and ~21.5% - 0.727b tokens distributed to 506 907 wallets (each, earning less than 3k tokens)

Ex-Chemist, Defi enthusiast, investing popularisator
FID: 191419

It's obvious concentration... https://warpcast.com/xrev/0x398f59fb